Generally, minibatch optimization is recommended due to inherent stochasticity. This approach was used by seminal publications like the original ReLU and Network-in-Network papers:
Using e.g. using 32 examples rather than all of the available data. makes the optimization to oscillate during a given epoch. Although this makes the optimization slower, it is less likely to get stuck in local minima.
On the other hand, it is possible to optimize quickly and then try to bypass local minima. This request is to implement a method to set batch size to the maximum allowable by the computer memory. A multiplier may be used to reserve small amounts of memory for basic computer operations.
Generally, minibatch optimization is recommended due to inherent stochasticity. This approach was used by seminal publications like the original ReLU and Network-in-Network papers:
https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2012/file/c399862d3b9d6b76c8436e924a68c45b-Paper.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.4400v3.pdf http://proceedings.mlr.press/v15/glorot11a/glorot11a.pdf
Using e.g. using 32 examples rather than all of the available data. makes the optimization to oscillate during a given epoch. Although this makes the optimization slower, it is less likely to get stuck in local minima.
On the other hand, it is possible to optimize quickly and then try to bypass local minima. This request is to implement a method to set batch size to the maximum allowable by the computer memory. A multiplier may be used to reserve small amounts of memory for basic computer operations.