Open lhommev opened 1 year ago
This is a bug. It should be false based on the type alone. I'm not even sure whats happening here that the result is true.
On closer inspection i think it is correct to just return false. At first i was under the assumption the return value is "true". In my mind throwing an exception should only be done if the expression is incorrect. In this case i would go with what JavaScript does.
Hi, I'm using this library and I am very pleased with the capabilities and performance. With vey large data to process, i see ~400K evaluations per seconds with 12 cores CPUs.
Anyway, i noticed that there is no exception thrown when doing this:
123 == "abc"
I would expect an error with this expression. Does this make sense to you ?