Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
not a bad idea indeed... I'll think a bit more about it but sounds cool
Original comment by anti...@gmail.com
on 23 Aug 2010 at 4:07
I'm also interested by this feature. Having only one point of write-access
protected by password and number of read-only clients will be something cool :)
But I think the more general mechanism will be implement whitelist or blacklist
of commands.
Original comment by jo...@zhr.pl
on 21 Jan 2011 at 6:49
any updates on this one? Really useful feature that I have to implement in a
client library instead of a config setting
Original comment by nike.gur...@gmail.com
on 4 Nov 2011 at 10:37
I would also greatly appreciate such an option.
Currently the only other way to achieve this is to use a different set of
usernames/passwords on a slave, and point the client to the slave rather than
the master.
Original comment by karen.et...@gmail.com
on 10 Jan 2013 at 5:47
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ryan.a.l...@gmail.com
on 24 Nov 2009 at 3:49