beryx / badass-runtime-plugin

Create a custom runtime image of your non-modular application
https://badass-runtime-plugin.beryx.org
Apache License 2.0
161 stars 21 forks source link

Looking for co-maintainers #135

Open siordache opened 1 year ago

siordache commented 1 year ago

I'm looking for co-maintainers who can help keep the plugin alive. If you're interested, please leave a comment here. Anyone who is willing to help is welcome!

hakanai commented 1 year ago

I'd be up for it.

siordache commented 1 year ago

Great! I sent you an invitation.

fourlastor commented 1 year ago

Hi! What's the state of this project?

I started working on a plugin which uses this one to make it simpler to generate packaged binaries (ideally cross platform and signed, so far I can generate macos/linux for multiple architectures, unsigned, on the same platform)

This is what it would look like from the outside.

I'm at a point where I actually started considering forking this plugin, to be able to change the various extension fields to be properties (as that would make it simpler to incorporate it from another plugin), is that something you'd be interested in? In case I can make a PR

hakanai commented 1 year ago

I guess at this point, please submit the PR - it may depend on the complexity and how easy things are to read, but it sounds like an improvement to the API to me, so as long as it still passes checks...

As for my lack of activity, I was recently made redundant from the company where this plugin was very important to keep running. You might find another developer asking for contributor access here in the future, or people might find another escape route.

Personally I have been holding up a lot of hope for Compose Multiplatform, but not everyone can move to Compose. The closer we can golf the API to what Compose's plugin provides, though, the easier the migration will be.

fourlastor commented 1 year ago

ok, I didn't finish it yet (haven't tested it with my plugin), but I opened a draft #140 so that if you can give any early feedback if you want

I'm trying to keep the same api (method wise) so hopefully this won't introduce breaking changes

t-patt commented 1 year ago

I'd be happy to contribute