Open AlinaXie opened 3 years ago
Same issue here
Hi, Because I read your paper before, I think it is an interesting topic. So I try to reproduce it. But when I train the image model, its result is very strange. The validation accuracy always shows 1. I do not whether there is a problem when I process the code. I have tried many methods but I cannot solve it. I would be appreciated if I can receive your help. Thanks.
@AlinaXie and @bharathichezhiyan
I somehow managed to resolve this error by refactoring the image_model
function and removing GlobalAveragePooling2D()
, and also, modified the image neural network to some extent.
I am mentioning the code for your further reference :
def Image_Model(base_model):
for layer in base_model.layers:
layer.trainable = False
x = base_model.output
return (x)
Neural Network :
#MAIN IMAGE MODEL - II :
def get_image_only_model():
pre_trained_image_model_vgg16 = VGG16(include_top=False, weights='/content/vgg16_weights_tf_dim_ordering_tf_kernels_notop.h5',input_shape=(224,224) + (3,))
base_model_loaded = Image_Model(pre_trained_image_model_vgg16)
flatten_layer = Flatten()(base_model_loaded)
dropout_layer = Dropout(0.5)(flatten_layer)
image_pred_layer = Dense(1, activation='sigmoid')(dropout_layer)
image_only_model = Model(inputs = [pre_trained_image_model_vgg16.input], outputs = image_pred_layer)
return image_only_model
This worked with showing somewhat better learning for VGG16 Model :
@harshgeek4coder I followed your instruction but still get val_accuracy of 1, could you share your code?
Hi, i have a similar issue, the val_acc always show 0.000, any advice?
Hi, Because I read your paper before, I think it is an interesting topic. So I try to reproduce it. But when I train the image model, its result is very strange. The validation accuracy always shows 1. I do not whether there is a problem when I process the code. I have tried many methods but I cannot solve it. I would be appreciated if I can receive your help. Thanks.