Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Fixed in r1412, going to test it now.
Original comment by jonne.z...@gmail.com
on 27 Jan 2008 at 6:38
It seems I reset the clock correctly. But there's still another problem.
...
../TestSuites/Tactical/ECE3.PGN 568 : 'Ke5' != 'f5'
Clock: 40<40 3+0
resign
Here Gray matter resigns at position 569, but this seems undeterministic.
Running
again it either doesn't resign, or sometimes at another (random) position.
Why? The clock says play the next 40 moves in 3 csecs.
I also tried with 30 csecs, also got the error sometimes.
Does this mean GM cannot even find a legal move within time?
And then resigns? Hmmzzz
Original comment by jonne.z...@gmail.com
on 27 Jan 2008 at 7:12
I know it's the last line of
void search_mtdf::iterate(int s)
that calls print_result with
a null move.
Maybe the status is changing too quickly, we had a problem like that before...
Original comment by jonne.z...@gmail.com
on 27 Jan 2008 at 7:26
Could someone tell me where to find this ECE3.PGN file, so i can fix this when
I get
time? Also, perhaps we could put all of the other test files you all may have
on the
downloads, so others can mess with them?
Mike
Original comment by protonsp...@gmail.com
on 10 Jul 2009 at 9:31
Sorry Mike, I have problems finding it myself (my laptop crashed some time ago,
but I
might still have it at some other place). I'm not sure whether we're allowed to
put a
copy on our project site. If so, we should certainly do that.
Here are some other interesting links:
- http://www.arasanchess.org/tests.html
ECE stands for "Encyclopedia of Chess Endings" if I'm correct. I thought it
would be
better to test Gray Matter on endgames first, just like I think a human player
should
start by studying endgame positions.
Aha, I think I've found them all here ->
http://code.google.com/p/tropo/source/detail?r=33
Jonne.
Original comment by jonne.z...@gmail.com
on 4 Aug 2009 at 1:19
This also seems very suitable as a test suite:
http://www.jakob.at/steffen/hossa/testsuites/wac.epd
Original comment by jonne.z...@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2009 at 7:44
I've successfully done the test many times. There do not seem to be any issues
in the current version.
Original comment by protonsp...@gmail.com
on 29 Jul 2010 at 9:45
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jonne.z...@gmail.com
on 28 Dec 2007 at 8:43