Closed TacoTheDank closed 3 years ago
Thank you!
@btimofeev Thanks for merging!
A small side note relating to your inversion commit here, I chose to do the double negative because while isInvisible
returns either INVISIBLE or VISIBLE, isVisible
returns either VISIBLE or GONE. Just wanted to make sure your change is actually intentional, since the view being gone means space for it is no longer reserved (while the original code had it simply being invisible) :)
(example here)
@TacoTheDank Yes, I got it. Both GONE and INVISIBLE are suitable for current layouts. The code is easier to read without inversion, so I fixed it.
@btimofeev Alright, thanks for responding :)
1st commit
2nd commit
3rd commit
4th commit
5th commit
6th commit
7th commit