Closed humanumbrella closed 2 years ago
Thanks for the PR! Do you have any documentation you can link to on why m/45'/1...
is testnet? I'm not familiar with that and don't see it in the the BIP45 spec. The examples in the spec even include some m/45'/1...
that I believe are mainnet (they're not explicitly testnet).
I checked Electrum and Sparrow and they both default to m/45'/0
(not m/45'/1
), but you can alter them.
Note that if you're trying to import a Named{HD}PublicKey
(perhaps as part of a PSBT) you can set the network (this code is only called when no network is supplied). Perhaps that's the logic you're looking for?
Unfortunately, I don't have a reference to a BIP or spec as we use a combination of them, hehe.
One way to think of Unchained's usage pattern is essentially BIP44
except under m/45'
instead of m/44'
to both designate it's multisig and to avoid any BIP44
space usage collisions that may be used for singlesig. Here's a link to trezor firmware carveouts that may provide some additional clarity.
You're right that m/45'/1
could be mainnet per the spec - but this PR adds m/45'/1'/*
as testnet, which is not specified in the spec. Interestingly that would still not cover all of our use cases, so perhaps I do need to go find the other logic you reference.
What do you think?
Gotcha... Can you try passing in the network to the Named{HD}PublicKey
constructor?
Going to close this, as I think this is user error. Will reopen if I determine otherwise, ty for the responses.
small bugfix