burningmantech / ranger-ims-server

Ranger Incident Management System—Server
Apache License 2.0
27 stars 7 forks source link

rename "incident reports" to "field reports" in UI #1378

Closed srabraham closed 1 week ago

srabraham commented 2 weeks ago

also start using the initialism "IMS #" for incident number and "FR #" for field report number.

This is only a surface-level change, affecting pieces of IMS that are visible to users. There's a bunch more work to do sometime to rename everything else, from persistence to server code to APIs to JavaScript internals.

Relevant issue: https://github.com/burningmantech/ranger-ims-server/issues/371#issuecomment-2460716389

github-actions[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

⚠️ Optional matrix job Py:3.14.0-alpha.1 - ubuntu-latest failed ⚠️

codecov[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 33.33333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 69.11%. Comparing base (03df98e) to head (8e44e4d). Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ement/incident/report_template/_report_template.py 0.00% 1 Missing :warning:
...ent/incident/reports_template/_reports_template.py 0.00% 1 Missing :warning:
Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1378 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 69.11% 69.11% ======================================= Files 181 181 Lines 8937 8937 Branches 1496 1496 ======================================= Hits 6177 6177 Misses 2661 2661 Partials 99 99 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

wsanchez commented 1 week ago

I was thinking about calling them "field incident reports" but this is less confusing.

srabraham commented 1 week ago

I was thinking about calling them "field incident reports" but this is less confusing.

I was just following your lead on this comment: https://github.com/burningmantech/ranger-ims-server/issues/371#issuecomment-593676020