Closed srabraham closed 1 week ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 33.33333%
with 2 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 69.11%. Comparing base (
03df98e
) to head (8e44e4d
). Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
...ement/incident/report_template/_report_template.py | 0.00% | 1 Missing :warning: |
...ent/incident/reports_template/_reports_template.py | 0.00% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
I was thinking about calling them "field incident reports" but this is less confusing.
I was thinking about calling them "field incident reports" but this is less confusing.
I was just following your lead on this comment: https://github.com/burningmantech/ranger-ims-server/issues/371#issuecomment-593676020
also start using the initialism "IMS #" for incident number and "FR #" for field report number.
This is only a surface-level change, affecting pieces of IMS that are visible to users. There's a bunch more work to do sometime to rename everything else, from persistence to server code to APIs to JavaScript internals.
Relevant issue: https://github.com/burningmantech/ranger-ims-server/issues/371#issuecomment-2460716389