Closed XiaoWang-Github closed 2 years ago
Xiao, the microscopy recon is always going to be a little blurry due to the limited data. However, I agree that, on average, the recons tend to be a bit over regularized. This is closely related to the issue #239, which recommends reducing "regularization" for the proximal map mode.
I propose we try two changes in the prerelease branch that address both problems consistently.
In auto_sigma_x
we can change the scaling factor to 0.3
so that:
return_ 0.3 * auto_sigma_prior(sino, delta_channel, sharpness)
And in In auto_sigma_p
we can change the scaling factor to 2.0
so that:
return 2.0 * auto_sigma_prior(sino, delta_channel, sharpness)
There could be some backward compatibility issues, but I think it's better to pull the bandaid off now. If this is agreeable to everyone, I can make the changes, and then you can try running the new code to see if you like it better.
Sounds good!
I had an extensive discussion with Jordan about this, and I'm talking to different people to formulate the best solution. This is a very small change, but it needs to be done very carefully.
OK, my solution to this problem was just to increase the value of sharpness in the demos. In the future, we may want to increase the default sharpness values in the code.
Both the 2D and 3D Shepp Logan as well as microscopy demo reconstructions look blurry. See the attached images. Are the prior parameters set wrong?