calcpsu / cphp82001

CalcPack replacement for HP 82001, suits HP35/45/55/65/67 calculators
Other
2 stars 0 forks source link

R1 and R8 values differ between schematics and BOM #4

Closed MilovdZee closed 1 month ago

MilovdZee commented 2 months ago

It does not really matter but it is just inconsistent.

Also from the specs: Programs the Fast-charge current setting. External resistor from ISET to VSS defines fast charge current value. Range is 10.8kΩ (50mA) to 675Ω (800mA).

So the 11k resister exceeds the max value. The BOM value of 10k is probably better.

I think you mean to set the values in the schematics also to 1k3 and 10k. That at least is consistent with the specs and the BOM.

grob6000 commented 2 months ago

The BOM was outdated; I've re-run direct from KICAD and it should now match the v4 schematic (0dc3c41eb4f7892238718d715c050627dc70e223). Thanks for spotting.

R1=1.8k provides USB charging current of 540/1.8 = 300mA, which is an ideal safe charge current of 0.2C for a 1500mAh battery R1=1.3k would be 415mA, which is close to 0.2C for a 2000mAh battery.

R1+R8 sets the charge current when connected to the HP original charger (in-system). This is more the critical value. I know the datasheet says 10.8k max (50mA min), but hear me out:

The original HP charger supplies 50mA constant current (mine does 49.5mA pretty consistently, I'd be keen to collect more data but given the simple 2 transistor design I'm surprised it's better than +/-2mA).

When the 50mA supply is fed to the pads, the voltage will rise to above B+, and U3 will switch off, preventing this from directly feeding B+ - great. Note that U7 (NCP380) does not prevent backfeed (acts like a diode), so when the pad voltage exceeds 4.4V, U4 will switch on, and connect the pads to VIN of the U1 (BQ21040) via Q2 and U7 (which might be bypassed, if using the regulated design). U1 then starts up and charges the battery at ISET.

I did consider relying on the BQ20140 current throttling (i.e. by replacing Q2 with a diode), however this means the charging IC is powered even when the battery is idle. In this case, it will not meet the power good threshold, and stay in standby mode. However, standby current is 125uA. In comparison, U4 consumes 30uA only. The 4.4V threshold must be above the charging output voltage (4.28V max).

Therefore, it's kind of critical that ISET is low enough that the total current draw (ISET + 1mA for U1, 1mA for CHG LED) does not exceed the constant current input supply (maybe 48mA minimum), such that a small margin is available to run through the 5.6V zener and maintain the pad voltage >4.4V. Using the table below, even 12.8k is marginal (<46mA being the target):

R1 R8 R1+R8 ISET
MIN
KISET=470
ISET
Nominal
KISET=527
ISET
Max
KISET=605
Recommend?
1.8k 10k 11.8k 🟢 39.8mA 🟢 44.7mA 🔴 51.3mA
1.8k 11k 12.8k 🟢 36.7mA 🟢 41.2mA 🟠 47.3mA ✔️
1.3k 10k 11.3k 🟢 41.6mA 🟠 46.6mA 🔴 53.5mA
1.3k 11k 12.3k 🟢 38.2mA 🟢 42.8mA 🟠 49.2mA ✔️

Note the datasheet does provide KISET values for 25~60mA (and lower!): image

Now you've made me look at it again, I could in theory put 1V of diode between Q2 pin 3 and VCC, such that the idle voltage of 5.6V meant 4.6V at VCC (plenty for a 50mA charge), and at the cutout of VOUTF=4.4V, VCC was 3.4V - which would let U1 current throttle as designed, and thus the ISET could be 50mA (so 9.1k would work), and charge would be 20% faster.

MilovdZee commented 2 months ago

Wow, a very comprehensive answer :) I'll study it :)

grob6000 commented 1 month ago

R1 and R8 values revisited for v5: 30ffbc13f589585e5461ab38b471176c49de2603