Closed SnO2WMaN closed 5 years ago
I wanted to try it out and made it first. The administrator authority will be transferred over time.
I don't know how I feel about the org thing 🤔
There are a ton of projects related with gitmoji and I don't think we need to group them
I think the idea behind it was to unite the official tooling with the gitmoji repository, for instance to give a message that gitmoji-cli
is the official primary utility. Approving an independent project and migrating it to the group would be a way to "grant approval" from Gitmoji author. Another thing is that the project looks more "trustworthy" when goin the extra step of creating an organization, than just being in private space.
The idea makes sense to me, but it's not a big deal. If you detest the idea, or are not convinced about its results or if they seem irrelevant @carloscuesta, feel free to close. Unless @SnO2WMaN can provide arguments I missed.
Let's see if @SnO2WMaN can answer some of my questions before addressing this properly
It is correct as @grissius has commented.
I showed the idea of gitmoji preset at #354. This is the first reason I built gitmoji-org unofficially.
Currently, gitmoji presets are managed by lerna in the form of monorepo, but originally we intended to manage them individually in a repository called gitmoji-preset- *. This is because the issue proposals are inconsistent and easy to see.
My claim is that I wanted to be convincing by managing individual contribution guides, RFCs, and websites in separate repositories. Sorry for not answering the questions so much, and in English.
Though I like the idea of org, I think that introducing decentralized presets is a road to hell, apart from the implementation issues I summarized in #354
Currently there is a negative opinion about preset, so for the time being, all repositories in the current gitmoji-org will be transferred to my personal repository. gitmoji-org will be left as it is, so please think again if you feel like it...
There is just negative opinion from my side about the implementation of the solution. @carloscuesta might have a different opinion.
hello @carloscuesta and @grissius
As far as I know, there are several packages about gitmoji.
How about transferring these repositories to gitmoji org?