Closed tobyhodges closed 4 months ago
Thank you for your pull request :smiley:
:robot: This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.
If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:
:mag: Inspect the changes: https://github.com/carpentries/instructor-training/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-1690
The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:
12-homework.md | 2 +-
demo_lessons.md | 11 ++++++++++-
md5sum.txt | 6 +++---
setup.md | 2 +-
4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
:stopwatch: Updated at 2024-07-10 17:51:23 +0000
@tobyhodges should we also add a temporary flag on the teaching demo episodes page (either in the table or the header) with information on older versions for people who already started preparing their teaching demos? We could queue another PR that removes the flag/warning in a month or something.
Happy to add that if you feel it's necessary, @ndporter. The goal of adding notices to the lesson landing page and repository was to raise awareness of these changes before they took place, but it may still be necessary to give folks a heads-up after the fact.
Happy to add that if you feel it's necessary, @ndporter. The goal of adding notices to the lesson landing page and repository was to raise awareness of these changes before they took place, but it may still be necessary to give folks a heads-up after the fact.
It's only for the teaching demos and mostly for people who already did their training but haven't done demos (as well as for the trainers leading the demo sessions) so we make sure everyone is (literally) on the same page as far as what episode/lesson is being used.
Combining these two comments from @ndporter, above:
I feel like the Manipulating data episode is less likely than the ggplot2 one to result in people no getting to any output in their 3 minute practice teaching.
and
I also believe (though it should be checked) that none of the episodes actually have dependencies on previously created data (e.g. they only depend on original data and packages), so we may be able to remove the note on "other episodes".
I have changed my mind and think the Exploring and understanding data episode is the best starting point for teaching demos. The episode begins with library(ratdat)
, which loads in the complete_old
data frame used in the content, and should offer more opportunity for trainees to get into some live coding within their five/three minutes. I will update the PR accordingly.
I think this is ready to go.
Things make way more sense now. I was looking at a cached copy in my browser of the lesson and so it was actually the previous version. Now that I have the right one:
Sorry for getting confused, though I think it will work out better in the end now.
I have added a note next to each of the demo signups that included an episode from the previous version of the lesson. I will also send emails to each of those trainees so that they are definitely aware.
Thanks @brownsarahm and @ndporter
If this pull request addresses an open issue on the repository, please add 'Closes #NN' below, where NN is the issue number.
Closes #1683
Please briefly summarise the changes made in the pull request, and the reason(s) for making these changes.
See https://github.com/datacarpentry/R-ecology-lesson/issues/886 and the blog post linked from there for more context about the lesson redesign