Closed PedroHLC closed 1 year ago
Not sure if I agree on the timestamp priority, but it might make sense to make that an option, if it's easy enough to implement. But I do agree that if pkgver and pkgrel are the same, the timestamp should be checked next. (Alphabetically, "xz" is less than "zst", which would explain the current behavior.)
Also, if 1.0.0-rc1
is being sorted higher than 1.0.0
, then that would be a proper bug. I'm using a special version comparison function that specifies how versions are to be compared, and it's a little more involved. See https://github.com/cassava/repoctl/blob/devel/pacman/alpm/vercmp.go
This is probably not a problem anymore.
When
repoctl update $pkgname
is called it picks the wrong and outdate package instead of the newer one, that's happening with my xz->zst transactions. I think modified timestamp should be compared when pkgver and pkgrel are the same.EDIT: Thinking better about it, modified timestamp should always be preferred, this would solve problems like 1.0.0-rc1 being bigger than 1.0.0.