This is really good project but...

[lessload]

This is really good project but something dev should consider.

• name "cloak" is hard to find topic relate in search engine like google or etc. Make this project hard to get information and unpopular. recommend to change the name to something like "ck-cloak"
• re-design logo. (just recommend not importance much)
• wiki too low information for newbie. just open for community to edit it. something like https://github.com/DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-proxy/wiki do.
• or link to guid example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GikgtMBoaKo , https://www.oilandfish.com/posts/openvpn-cloak.html
• or script like https://github.com/HirbodBehnam/Shadowsocks-Cloak-Installer for deployment.

• This project really good. In my opinion concept of this project better than "stunnel" and "V2Ray". but need a lot of feature develop and security audit.

[notsure2]

Yes it has a big advantage of not needing any TLS certificate on the server side.

[diyism]

Yes it has a big advantage of not needing any TLS certificate on the server side.

Yes, it's better than v2ray, trojan-go, and naiveproxy, all of them need to deploy a domain name and tls cert, and it's better than any "sni trick" / "domain fronting" tools: PowerTunnel, SNI-Mask, revolter-firefox etc. I even think that we should integrate the Cloak client into the chrome/firefox/bromite browser and integrate the Cloak server into the caddy/haproxy/nico web server. Why isn't there a standalone Cloak VPN?