issues
search
cbor-wg
/
cddl-more-control
Second extension pack of CDDL control operators after RFC 9165
Other
0
stars
1
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Type columns
#8
cabo
closed
3 months ago
0
Maybe more standards-oriented language for section on byte strings?
#7
laurencelundblade
opened
3 months ago
3
Close #4
#6
cabo
closed
4 months ago
1
Dot join
#5
cabo
closed
4 months ago
0
Fortify strictness of RFC 4648 (baseNN)
#4
cabo
closed
4 months ago
0
Don't complicate example 4 with generics
#3
cabo
closed
8 months ago
0
Self-contained examples
#2
mguetschow
closed
8 months ago
4
Clarification on example in 3.1
#1
mguetschow
closed
8 months ago
0