Closed touchandswipe closed 9 years ago
The (id) convention was used for buffs, not passives.
I might use [id] instead for passives.
Wouldn't [ ] have problems with json? Maybe just a - would do? E.g. ATK Buff - 13 or ATK buff #17 On 20 Mar 2015 8:08 pm, "Cheah Jun Siang" notifications@github.com wrote:
The (id) convention was used for buffs, not passives.
I might use [id] instead for passives.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Deathmax/bravefrontier_data/issues/22#issuecomment-83960311 .
AFAIK, [] doesn't need to be escaped. In any case, I'll be exposing the underlying ids for the effects in the next push.
True that but [ ] is being read as an array type. Thanks and would be nice On 20 Mar 2015 8:21 pm, "Cheah Jun Siang" notifications@github.com wrote:
AFAIK, [] doesn't need to be escaped. In any case, I'll be exposing the underlying ids for the effects in the next push.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Deathmax/bravefrontier_data/issues/22#issuecomment-83963875 .
The new EU content has units (e.g. Skalmold) with ATK buff for Females and ATK buff for 5+ Elementals. The ATK buff are showing up as being similarly named, and not tied to the conditions. Would you be able to name it in similar ways with other ATK type buffs in BB / SBB skills? thank you