Open Phytoecia opened 8 months ago
I suspect a lower BUSCO score might be better?
Actually higher duplicated BUSCO score is expected as our model species has allotetraploid genome. I found that the p_utg file shows duplicated BUSCO>95% while the p_ctg file shows 57%. It seems that the purging step removes duplicated genes (which should remain). Thank you!
If hap1 and hap2 are both duplicated, it must be a real tetraploid
Hello,
I am using hifiasm to perform hifi-only assembly of a allopolyploid species. While the basic metrics are good (high N50, Complete BUSCO>98%), I got only 57% of Duplicated BUSCO. I suspected the homoelogues have been merged at some point in our run. In the Hifiasm paper, the strawberry genome showed very high Duicated BUSCO, which we desire. What can we try more?
Best, Minsoo