clamsproject / clams-python

CLAMS SDK for python
http://sdk.clams.ai/
Apache License 2.0
4 stars 1 forks source link

fixed multivalued parameter values were not correctly recorded in output MMIF #215

Closed keighrim closed 2 months ago

keighrim commented 2 months ago

fixes #214

codecov[bot] commented 2 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 73.66%. Comparing base (faf001f) to head (8c882b8). Report is 4 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #215 +/- ## =========================================== + Coverage 73.55% 73.66% +0.10% =========================================== Files 9 9 Lines 745 748 +3 =========================================== + Hits 548 551 +3 Misses 197 197 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/clamsproject/clams-python/pull/215/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=clamsproject) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/clamsproject/clams-python/pull/215/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=clamsproject) | `73.66% <100.00%> (+0.10%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=clamsproject#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.