Closed RyanGlScott closed 8 years ago
I believe this is just a typo, but currently there's a guard in toNatEquality that checks the following:
toNatEquality
isNatKind (typeKind t1) || isNatKind (typeKind t1)
Which is the same thing twice. Shouldn't the second type be t2?
t2
Good job spotting this. Thanks for the patch
I believe this is just a typo, but currently there's a guard in
toNatEquality
that checks the following:Which is the same thing twice. Shouldn't the second type be
t2
?