On the FreeTDS mailing list, James K. Lowden (one of the FreeTDS maintainers) took a look at the pymssql result-processing code and suggested some changes to make it use the DB-API of FreeTDS in a more canonical way. I don't know of any bugs in our current code, but James K. Lowden knows FreeTDS well, so it's probably worthy of reviewing his comments --we may have some yet unknown bugs: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.tds.freetds/15122
From msabramo on September 17, 2013 07:57:35
On the FreeTDS mailing list, James K. Lowden (one of the FreeTDS maintainers) took a look at the pymssql result-processing code and suggested some changes to make it use the DB-API of FreeTDS in a more canonical way. I don't know of any bugs in our current code, but James K. Lowden knows FreeTDS well, so it's probably worthy of reviewing his comments --we may have some yet unknown bugs: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.tds.freetds/15122
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/pymssql/issues/detail?id=126