Open JeffCX opened 1 year ago
https://docs.code4rena.com/awarding/incentive-model-and-awards#satisfactory-unsatisfactory-submissions
It is possible for a submission to be technically valid and still unsatisfactory. An “unsatisfactory” submission may meet any of these criteria: clearly overinflated severity
It is possible for a submission to be technically valid and still unsatisfactory. An “unsatisfactory” submission may meet any of these criteria:
clearly overinflated severity
emm I thought if the impact is medium, the warden submit the impact as high, it should be downgraded to medium instead of invalid
if the report is a valuable submission, the warden submit the impact as medium or high, it should be downgarded to QA instead of invalid
I generally believe that off-by-one is acceptable with notable exception of findings that are already clearly labelled in the org (e.g. 2 step error as Med is an insta scrap)
https://docs.code4rena.com/awarding/incentive-model-and-awards#satisfactory-unsatisfactory-submissions
emm I thought if the impact is medium, the warden submit the impact as high, it should be downgraded to medium instead of invalid
if the report is a valuable submission, the warden submit the impact as medium or high, it should be downgarded to QA instead of invalid