Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
This will certainly be possible to implement. What tracknumber should be
assigned to
this track? Perhaps track 0(zero)?
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 12 Dec 2007 at 7:45
Yes, that's what I have been calling the track. That would be really great. :)
Original comment by mar...@wustenberg.dk
on 12 Dec 2007 at 11:39
An alternative would be to prepend the sectors to track 1. Anyone?
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 31 Mar 2008 at 8:23
I would not like that approach, as it would alter what exactly the first track
is. It
could possibly confuse fingerprinting of the tracks (like used at
musicbrainz.org and
last.fm). Of course, if users of the ripper are given a choice to not prepend
it,
it's fine. But I would really opt for using track 0.
Just my thoughts. :)
Original comment by mar...@wustenberg.dk
on 31 Mar 2008 at 8:31
Isn't this exactly what a cuesheet tries to solve?
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 31 Mar 2008 at 8:41
But I don't think that most people use cue sheets? Maybe it's a bad guess. I
know I
don't. Anyway, how I understand cuesheets, they are used when ripping an album
to a
single file, and not the current rubyripper approach (ripping to multiple
files), so
I still stand by my statement.
Original comment by mar...@wustenberg.dk
on 31 Mar 2008 at 8:55
Current solution, resulting from issue 123 is to prepend any lost sectors to the
resulting track. This includes a hidden first track. I'm looking for a better
solution though.
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 10 Apr 2008 at 8:15
[deleted comment]
I'm not absolutely certain if this is related, but the only cd I've been unable
to
rip since upgrading to 0.5.5 also happens to be the only cd that I own that has
a
hidden track in pregap before track one (as far as I know), so a connection
seems
pretty likely.
I generally have been ripping all of my cd's to single file images with cue
sheets,
but when I ran into trouble with this one, I tried to rip it in the more
traditional,
one file per track format, and still have had no luck. The GUI of Rubyripper
shows
no progress, but the commandline output yields a seemingly endless repetition of
"scsi_read error" messages. Here's the first several lines of the output:
intrepid@intrepid-laptop:~$ rrip_gui
ruby-gettext is not found. Translations are disabled!
Ripping track 0
cdparanoia III release 10.0 (June 10, 2008)
Ripping from sector 0 (track 0 [0:00.00])
to sector 259881 (track 10 [6:52.13])
outputting to /home/intrepid/Music/flac/Cool Hand Luke/temp/track0_1.wav
(== PROGRESS == [> | 000117 00 ] == :-0 ==)
scsi_read error: sector=226 length=13 retry=0
Sense key: 5 ASC: 64 ASCQ: 0
Transport error: Illegal SCSI request (rejected by target)
System error: Invalid argument
(== PROGRESS == [> | 000126 00 ] == :-0 . ==)
scsi_read error: sector=201 length=13 retry=0
Sense key: 3 ASC: 11 ASCQ: 0
Transport error: Illegal SCSI request (rejected by target)
System error: Invalid argument
scsi_read error: sector=201 length=6 retry=1
Sense key: 3 ASC: 11 ASCQ: 0
Transport error: Illegal SCSI request (rejected by target)
System error: Invalid argument
scsi_read error: sector=201 length=3 retry=2
Sense key: 3 ASC: 11 ASCQ: 0
Transport error: Illegal SCSI request (rejected by target)
System error: Invalid argument
I'm using Rubyripper 0.5.5 on Ubuntu 8.10. Hopefully this is helpful.
Original comment by wrk...@gmail.com
on 19 Feb 2009 at 11:02
Please join in at the AnalyzingDisc_Research wiki page. The plan is to use
cdrdao to
get the info about the disc.
Please show what the output is for a disc with a hidden track:
cdrdao read-toc --device /dev/cdrom output
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 11 Jul 2009 at 9:17
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 11 Jul 2009 at 9:47
Is it possible to provide the output.toc of on a disc with a hidden track?
cdrdao read-toc --device /dev/cdrom output.toc
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 12 Jul 2009 at 11:45
Here we are. Looking at it myself it seems to call it SILENCE which I can
inform you
is not the case. The CD is Rammstein - Reise, Reise (UK release) and the pregap
is
not silence. I believe cdrdao bases this off the TOC however, because it
skipped over
this portion in <1 second, where as it does not take <1 second to do other 30
second
portions of this disk.
Original comment by fergof...@gmail.com
on 12 Jul 2009 at 11:58
Attachments:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mar...@wustenberg.dk
on 11 Dec 2007 at 6:31