which uses the implicit max_pin='x' major-level pinning for pin_subpackage. This would mean MKL 2023.{0, 1, 2} are ABI-compatible between each other, but not with 2024.x (which are themselves again inter-compatible).
This sounds fishy to me, at least I'm not aware of the year-portion of the CalVer indicating compatibility here.
Could you please enlighten us here @conda-forge/intel_repack?
CC @hmaarrfk, this impacts the mkl2024 migration, which might or might not be useful in light of this.
MKL currently does https://github.com/conda-forge/intel_repack-feedstock/blob/c007b4da38dfd8056ff59b6a7a089507ed2c16ce/recipe/meta.yaml#L453-L460
which uses the implicit
max_pin='x'major-level pinning forpin_subpackage. This would mean MKL 2023.{0, 1, 2} are ABI-compatible between each other, but not with 2024.x (which are themselves again inter-compatible).This sounds fishy to me, at least I'm not aware of the year-portion of the CalVer indicating compatibility here.
Could you please enlighten us here @conda-forge/intel_repack?
CC @hmaarrfk, this impacts the mkl2024 migration, which might or might not be useful in light of this.