Open kohr-h opened 6 years ago
I think it can be changed to use that notation, I just haven't update this recipe since that syntax became available.
The method currently in meta.yaml
was the recommended way at one point. As long as the package builds against a NumPy that is not newer than the one the user has installed, it is fine (NumPy has a policy to maintain backwards ABI compatibility). I think those specific versions were the oldest with packages available for each python version/platform.
also, I should note that pyNFFT unfortunately no longer seems to be actively maintained and if I think it only works with NFFT 3.2.x.
As long as the package builds against a NumPy that is not newer than the one the user has installed, it is fine (NumPy has a policy to maintain backwards ABI compatibility). I think those specific versions were the oldest with packages available for each python version/platform.
Ah I see, makes sense. Then it's fine to build with 1.11, say, and not to require a specific Numpy version. AFAIK the current recommended way to do that is to specify numpy: 1.11
in conda_build_config.yaml
and then use host: numpy {{ numpy }}
and run: numpy
in meta.yaml
.
also, I should note that pyNFFT unfortunately no longer seems to be actively maintained and if I think it only works with NFFT 3.2.x.
Right, it hasn't been active in a while. There has been one commit to master, though, that makes pyNFFT build against 3.3 and higher. I tested updating the recipe with current Git master, and it seems to work with 3.4.1 (I haven't tested a lot of functionality).
I was considering a PR into pyNFFT to allow different dtypes, as upstream NFFT has support for single and long double since version 3.3 or so.
Since this package uses the Numpy C API, doesn't the recipe have to pin the Numpy version to the one it was built with? Like so: