Closed Tim-Zhang closed 1 year ago
Patch and project coverage have no change.
Comparison is base (
476446f
) 25.76% compared to head (34003e3
) 25.76%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
could another option be to bump the rust version but use a #[allow(clippy:<rule>)]
with a comment that we want to support older versions of the tool chain? How far back do the older rust version need to be supported?
@jsturtevant Not only for the problem we just met but also we want to do this long ago. Because we the developers need a stable expectation that unchanged code should pass the CI as it did last time.
We will increase the version manually when we need afterwards. Thanks!
We've had enough with clippy errors happens with code untouched. And the clippy(1.68) suggestion about enum Default derive is conflict with lower Rust version(<1.66)
To avoid this problem we lock the rust version and make it steady.