Open geofurb opened 9 months ago
++
I agree.
+1
I don't mean to jump to conclusions, but I hope the founders don't develop a "ship dies with the captain" mentality that happens so frequently.
This website is also owned by Microsoft. You can give it a try
I completely agree. The model and the use of the model is a bit too restrictive now the enterprise is shutting down.
BTW: Is there any page explaining why they stopped? And if the project may live with the community?
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. You might also look our discussion channels.
Wanted to re-up this, @erogol @JRMeyer @kdavis-coqui
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. You might also look our discussion channels.
Bump
Any updates, even the link to purchase one is not working
The (unofficial) legal opinion that I'm aware of is that these models can be treated as public domain, based on these answers:
Who will own the IP of Coqui (& licensing rights) after the shutdown? Answer: noone
The (unofficial) legal opinion that I'm aware of is that these models can be treated as public domain, based on these answers:
Who will own the IP of Coqui (& licensing rights) after the shutdown? Answer: noone
So as of now can we consider xtts to be under public domain? I mean its still very unclear tho, i hope smone from the coqui team clarify this
Bump
There's nothing we can do :(
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. You might also look our discussion channels.
So here is an activity, damned bot
Yeah this is getting ridiculous. If they’re abandoning it, they need to make it clear. It’s pretty cowardly to do what they’re doing right now.
The licenses are already clearly stated (MPL 2.0 for the code, CPML for the XTTS model). I wouldn't expect these to change since the company has shut down.
The licenses are already clearly stated (MPL 2.0 for the code, CPML for the XTTS model). I wouldn't expect these to change since the company has shut down.
I get that, but they really should open source the model or make it more permissive. I'm actually kind of surprised that they were able to even sell commercial licenses since I think some of the training data is CC-BY-NC 4.0. I can't remember which one I saw that mentioned that.
Pre-emptive 🖕🖕🖕 for stale bot.
The company is shutting down and can no longer license this project for commercial purposes or benefit from such licensing. Suggest moving to MIT license for more permissive modification and redistribution by the community.