Closed sebsilas closed 10 months ago
Hi @sebsilas,
The behaviour you describe is actually not a bug, but a design decision (we here follow Eid et al., 2010). However, if you don't like $\beta$
, you can use argument est_name
to pick whatever estimate name you want:
mod <- lmer(mpg ~ cyl + hp + disp + (1|gear), data = mtcars)
mod |>
apa_print(est_name = "b") |>
apa_table()
Ah ok, I thought there wasn't an agreed upon way of presenting standardised coefficients for mixed effects models. Could you give me the full reference please? Thanks!
I also think there is no agreed-upon way, which is why we used this (German) stats text book as a starting point:
Eid, M., Gollwitzer, M., & Schmitt, M. (2010). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden [Statistics and research methods] (5th ed.). Beltz, Weinheim, Germany.
Describe the bug
When I print the results of a mixed-effects model to a table using
apa_print
andapa_table
, the table header labelling is for a standardised beta coefficient (β), but I believe this should be the unstandardised beta coefficient for a mixed-effects model (B)?To Reproduce
Expected behavior Instead of "β" in the table header, I would expect to see "Β".