search

cta-wave / technical-working-group

7 stars 0 forks source link

Issues to be addressed at IBC 2018 face-to-face workshop #6

Closed wilaw closed 3 years ago

wilaw commented 6 years ago

Use this issue to add discussion topics to be addressed at the face-to-face meeting on Tuesday Sept 18th at Amsterdam Marriot Hotel. For each topic please provide

  1. A title
  2. Which TF this applies to - HATF, CSTF or DPCTF
  3. background info on the subject & questions/proposals/solutions
wilaw commented 6 years ago

CSTF - cdv1 Conclude discussions on cdv1 - see https://standards.cta.tech/apps/org/workgroup/cstf/download.php/23750/Meeting%20Notes%20WAVE%20Content%20Spec%20TF%20Meeting_20180725.pdf

wilaw commented 6 years ago

CSTF - Approval process for media profiles

The approval process for media profiles (MP) has been documented and agreed upon in the WAVE CSTF. There are questions that need resolving, such as:

  1. Are the requirements for a SDP distinct from those of an MP (section 2.2, of [WAVE MP]), or is it simply a matter of updating the language to mention both MP and SDP?
  2. A SDP is applied to MPs, and a client which only understands the underlying MP and not the SDP should perform normally. This is a device playback consideration, but is it also a content spec consideration?
  3. An SDP (SEI message) does have MSE requirements, which should be captured in the binding specification. Is there generic language we can place in WAVE regarding this, or must it be captured individually in each SDP CMAF binding spec?
wilaw commented 6 years ago

DPCTF & HATF Should the issues identified for the User Agent Integration spec be implemented as an extension of the DPCTF spec and test? Identified issues are:

image

wilaw commented 5 years ago

Should HATF or DPCTF own User Agent issues such as cookies and key testing ?

wilaw commented 5 years ago

How to submit modified test content back to WAVE and a means to confirm it meets the spec(s).

Which TFs have scope over test content? I could see this being pretty much a DPCTF topic.  I’ve added CSTF because the format of test content needs to be compliant with CSTF specifications. So it seems DPCTF would be responsible for identifying requirements for test content, and CSTF somewhat involved in confirming that the content meets the Content spec. 

  1. What is the process for approving test content in the first place? The AI refers to modified content, but before we worry about mods we should have a process in place to vet the original test material. I assume test content will need to be run through the Content Validator, when it is ready.  However, I also assume we will have intentionally non-compliant content intended to trigger certain behaviors (error checking) in players?  Or not? We need people, ideally technically astute volunteers, to vet content according to a process.  This implies some carefully crafted requirements for each item.
wilaw commented 5 years ago

DPCTF - walk through of current spec 0.5.8

wilaw commented 5 years ago

License terms for WAVE test Content

Do we need separate license for source content versus encoded content? We cannot use BBB with Creative Commons No Derivative license?

Looking at a Creative Commons No Derivative Works + Attribution license. Details: https://creativecommons.org/choose The ND license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ Considering selecting the following terms: Attribution  You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NoDerivatives  If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. No additional restrictions  You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

jpiesing commented 5 years ago

Thomas's input about cmf2 (email of 27th August).

wilaw commented 5 years ago

DPCTF: MSE related issues

wilaw commented 5 years ago

DPCTF: Status of Specification and Open issues

wilaw commented 5 years ago

DPCTF: Proposed test process