Closed chfleming closed 4 years ago
Sorry I didn't get time to fix this earlier. The question reported by @Ferazevedo is actually this issue. I have added the unit and CI for tau.
However I'd like to keep the model summary result consistent with what ctmm got. If I copy the tau estimate to tau_position/tau_velocity but ctmm is showing them as NA, that might cause some confusion.
@chfleming , so you mean tau is only available for OUf, and I don't need to create tau, just put its value into tao_position, tau_velocity. Other models will not have tau value.
The model summary code is quite complex and I forgot many details. Now I got it.
OUf has a tau
, which is equal to tau[position]
and tau[velocity]
. This is the only model with just tau
.
OUO has something like tau[decay]
and tau[oscillation]
. I can look it up if you need. It wouldn't be terrible to treat tau[decay]
the same way, but tau[oscillation]
(or tau[period]
?) is pretty different.
I copied tau value of OUf to tau position and tau velocity. Though they are using different units because each column are formatted with best unit for whole column.
Do you want to copy tau[decay] to tau position, tau velocity for OUO too?
That sounds good.
tau are always time, right? I need to format them and take proper unit.
Yes.
Done.
In the model-fit summary table, there are no units or confidence intervals reported on the new OUf tau parameter estimates.
Specifically for the OUf model, it would be even more ideal to copy its tau estimate to both tau_position and tau_velocity, as they are constrained to be identical for that model.