Closed we-are-caper closed 7 years ago
Do we know of any art datasets that are reasonably small? Didn't the Whitworth gallery in Manchester do something?
The Whitworth stuff just ran off a csv. I'm having a think/explore.
Nothing wrong with CSVs – but are the files not public?
Brighton Museums seems to fit the bill http://www.images.brighton-hove-rpml.org.uk/assetbank-pavilion/action/browseItems?categoryId=1303&categoryTypeId=1
more info here http://rpmcollections.wordpress.com/2012/07/20/open-data-from-our-collections/ and on Mia's wiki: http://museum-api.pbworks.com/w/page/21933420/Museum%C2%A0APIs
Whitworth data, on Tim Waters' github: https://github.com/timwaters/whitworth-landscapes
Question: what's the etiquette of linking to an individual's account, rather than an organisations in this context?
The Brighton stuff is in, btw.
Re Etiquette: I think it's fine to link to an individual's account - if it's up on github. But you can always message the person to ask.
However, https://github.com/timwaters/whitworth-landscapes is a hack made with the data, not actually the data?
Obviously I don't expect every category to be populated, but filtering "art" by "small" and "medium" returns 0 entries, which might be seen to look at bit bad at launch, as it's the first set of filter. Is it possible to pop something in here for cosmetic purposes pls?!