Closed svenakela closed 8 months ago
I have one concern: I think its important that the features or implementations of the load balancing blueprint is not tied too tightly with this project. If we do, this will result in this repo having to update whenever new features were changed in the blueprint repo. So I think the readme should give very general information that the load balancing blueprint exists and then refer to the blueprint repos readme.
I have one concern: I think its important that the features or implementations of the load balancing blueprint is not tied too tightly with this project. If we do, this will result in this repo having to update whenever new features were changed in the blueprint repo. So I think the readme should give very general information that the load balancing blueprint exists and then refer to the blueprint repos readme.
I don't mind, feel free to remove as much as you like. Maybe even move to the bottom of the readme as "Usage Examples" or similar?
@sveinse had some spare time to adjust the readme. I've shortened the text and moved it to the bottom of the file.
@sveinse is this PR stale? The updates are at least much better than the previously approved adds.
@svenakela the PR isn't, but I am 🥲 I'll have to take a look at this as soon as I have the opportunity.
The contribution about load balancing was messing up the readme, I moved some text and added more info.