Closed gbalabasquer closed 5 years ago
@NiklasKunkel @rainbreak thoughts?
I'm okay with this as it would make DSProxy more composable. Do you see most usecases/integrations for DSProxy using extendable versions rather than the primitive?
Actually working now in the CdpHandler which extends from the DSProxy.
We are having an issue when extending DSProxy and DSProxyFactory. As the factory returns a DSProxy is not possible to rewrite the build functions without having to also returns a DSProxy. In this case we want to return a class that inherits from DSProxy. I'd suggest to return an address to make it more compatible.