Open Philac35 opened 1 month ago
Is there a particular use case for the need of having it as an options? Changing the code to support both will introduce a lot of complexity. Unless there is a compelling reason for it, prefer not to go down this path. Besides, there are a couple issues that would need to be addressed first.
Here, both type of parameters are generated. We need to delete one to get functionals classes. It seems that named parameters are privileged in Angel 3 . We could keep it. Perhaps someone need positionals parameters, that 's why i talked about the creation of an optional solution. In all cases, we should not have to delete half of parameters for each models. Thank you
There is no need to modify the generated classes. Could you share your models that are having this problem?
I understood why i got the pb. Except of jsonb set in generated files that suit for postgre whereas mysql need json, i successed to generate tables.
Hello, When we generate models with Angel3_orm_generator, it generates positionals parameters and nameds parameters. It should be interesting to have the choice. Thank you