Open homerunner-mqp opened 5 months ago
I just realized that transient dynamic tables will make a huge difference in our failsafe storage.
I just realized that transient dynamic tables will make a huge difference in our failsafe storage.
I have noticed the same. This would make a huge difference and is in line with Snowflake's recommendation for dynamic tables with high refresh throughput.
working on this https://github.com/dbt-labs/dbt-snowflake/pull/1210
waiting for approval but https://github.com/dbt-labs/dbt-snowflake/pull/1210 is good to merge
@dataders can I get an approval on https://github.com/dbt-labs/dbt-snowflake/pull/1210
@colin-rogers-dbt please can you approve https://github.com/dbt-labs/dbt-snowflake/pull/1210
@jhsb25 We are looking at this PR and will update accordingly if we are able to merge this in. Please do not tag adapter maintainers 🙏
Is this your first time submitting a feature request?
Describe the feature
Could we implement the "transient" table config to dynamic tables? Follows same pattern as for tables. https://docs.snowflake.com/en/sql-reference/sql/create-dynamic-table
Describe alternatives you've considered
None.
Who will this benefit?
For cases of dynamic tables as output from a data warehouse, it could decrease cost.
Are you interested in contributing this feature?
Possibly
Anything else?
No response