Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
This is tricky because the uid/gid of the user calling `chown` are masked by
the s3fs process owner. Do we just assume that's okay? What if s3fs is running
as root with 'allow_other'?
Original comment by ben.lema...@gmail.com
on 10 Mar 2011 at 9:51
I think that the "correct" operation should be like that of an nfs mount.
Instead of using the fuse option "allow_other", couldn't the normal mount
options of ro, rw, uid=, gid=, umask= be used?
It may take some experimentation to figure it out. ...or maybe allow_other is
needed as well?
...or maybe it is up to us to detect the unprivileged operation and return the
correct error code from s3fs?
Original comment by dmoore4...@gmail.com
on 11 Mar 2011 at 2:47
Hi
This issue is old s3fs version.
Latest version(now v1.69) fixes this issue, s3fs handles file permission on
s3fs mount.
Please use latest version and if you have a issue, please post new issue.
Thanks a lot.
Original comment by ggta...@gmail.com
on 29 May 2013 at 8:11
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
moore...@gmail.com
on 1 Jul 2010 at 5:14