We need some additional guidance on the protocol for giving both filter and indicator fields a name. This PR adds this into the Open Data Standards page.
Why are these changes being made?
We need consistency across the data catalogue in terms of how fields are named to:
help make it easier for users to navigate data
optimise how we store data and associated meta-data
provide standardised data for API users.
Checklist before requesting a review
[ ] I have checked the contributing guidelines
[ ] I have checked for and linked any relevant issues that this may resolve
[ ] I have checked that these changes build locally
[ ] I understand that if merged into main, these changes will be publicly available
Overview of changes
We need some additional guidance on the protocol for giving both filter and indicator fields a name. This PR adds this into the Open Data Standards page.
Why are these changes being made?
We need consistency across the data catalogue in terms of how fields are named to:
Checklist before requesting a review