Open sschuberth opened 8 years ago
Ninka already reports "Apache-1.0", so using "Apache-2.0" would be more consistent, plus the latter would match the name SPDX identifier.
In general, adopting the SPDX identifiers for all licenses would make sense IMHO. I propose to extend this bug to any license identifiers in Ninka that currently aren’t SPDX-compatible.
Ninka already reports "Apache-1.0", so using "Apache-2.0" would be more consistent, plus the latter would match the name SPDX identifier.