Closed didip closed 12 years ago
... provisionally -- looks great. One big question:
Why are you vendoring cssmin and jsmin when they're perfectly well available as gems?
Great question! Thanks for replying!
This pull request is the first pass of refactoring, just in case core developers have any feedback.
I vendored both because it was easier to do during the refactoring.
On Mar 29, 2012, at 7:53 AM, Jeremy Ashkenas wrote:
... provisionally -- looks great. One big question:
Why are you vendoring cssmin and jsmin when they're perfectly well available as gems?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/documentcloud/jammit/pull/227#issuecomment-4821803
Great -- then please update the pull request to reflect your complete and final proposed version, and we'll take another look.
@jashkenas The pull request is now ready for code review.
Looks good -- although I hope that folks don't start using CSSMin and JSMin in production, just because they'll be here by default.