Closed wadepickett closed 1 year ago
Searched through entire aspnetcore\tutorials node.
Zero hits for:
"Azure Active"
"Azure AD"
"Azure-active"
"Azure-ad"
"AAD" (which brings up 20 random doc ID's that had "aad" in the sequence but no legit AAD hits).
Next: verify aspnetcore/includes that might be used in the tutorials that mention a variation on AAD.
Found so far: aspnetcore/includes/DuendeldentityServer
Azure Active Directory (AAD) becomes Microsoft Entra (ME-ID)
Shouldn't this be Microsoft Entra ID (ME-ID) and only keep the ME-ID if it's actually used in the context?
Yes, I should have put Microsoft Entra ID (ME-ID)
I figured use just "ME-ID" after first use of "Microsoft Entra ID (ME-ID)" otherwise folks will not really know what that acronym is. That sound right?
Right, but if they never use AAD they would never need you to introduce ME-ID as its equivalent.
Aha, yes, sorry, I see your point. Use "Microsoft Entra ID (ME-ID)" if there is a second use where you would refer to (ME-ID) otherwise use Microsoft Entra ID.
Contributes to #30185
This is to track AAD rename updates in all topics I own outside of gRPC and SignalR (which are being tracked seperately) such as tutorials, etc.
Replace "Azure Active Directory," "Azure AD," and "AAD"
List topics here:
None for the tutorials node, but there are tutorials that use the following includes that require the rename:
Examples:
Product references:
Azure Active Directory becomes Microsoft Entra ID
Azure Active Directory (AAD) becomes Microsoft Entra ID (ME-ID), but only if we are really referring to "ME-ID" later, otherwise it would be "Microsoft Entra ID".
Azure AD becomes Microsoft Entra ID
AAD becomes ME-ID
Topic file names and their links: azure-active-directory.md might become microsoft-entra-id
Links: Azure Active Directory (AAD) or Azure Active Directory becomes Microsoft Entra ID (ME-ID) or just "Microsoft Entra ID" if there was no need to refer to later ME-ID after first use.
Associated WorkItem - 167640