dotnet / docs

This repository contains .NET Documentation.
https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
4.29k stars 5.92k forks source link

Documentation is outdated and too vague #14862

Open tbolon opened 5 years ago

tbolon commented 5 years ago

Document Details

Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

mairaw commented 5 years ago

Thanks for your feedback. @mlacouture is this something you can take a look?

tamlin-mike commented 5 years ago

I just wanted to chime in that I have also been bitten by this outdated documentation, spending almost a complete day to get this working, only to finally find this bug issue and the only thing that helped us (remove DotNetCliToolReference, submitted in this very bugreport by @tbolon - thanks).

To be blunt: Your outdated documentation is hurting people, Microsoft. Not only that, it displays you don't have a handle on things. That is a very worrying insight that could be a conrete reason to seriously reconsider whether dependency on Microsoft software at all has become too dangerous.

LaughingJohn commented 4 years ago

Just to add to this, I too have been struggling to get this to work (V2.2). I get a variety of different reasons for it not producing anything. I did once manage to get it product an XML serialization assembly for a class that barely had anything in it. In my case I have a wrapper library for a WCF proxy (in .Net standard 2.0. I would have thought that WCF would be quite a common reason for using this. I really can't figure out what I need to make it generate what I want (the serializer for actual proxy added using "Add connected service)". I've currently go it complaining about System.Private.ServiceModel assembly missing and failing to find any types to serialize.

Bit confused tbh!

ladipro commented 4 years ago

@mairaw would it be possible to bump the priority of this issue?

dotnet-bot commented 3 years ago

This issue has been closed as part of the issue backlog grooming process outlined in #22351.

That automated process may have closed some issues that should be addressed. If you think this is one of them, reopen it with a comment explaining why. Tag the @dotnet/docs team for visibility.

tbolon commented 3 years ago

@mairaw @ladipro maybe this issue should be reopened? The example is still outdated, and now that the package and the csproj format are stable, the example could be updated and be mostly valid for future .net releases. Your thoughts?

mairaw commented 3 years ago

@mlacouture do you still own this?

tdykstra commented 3 years ago

@HongGit owns it now and will be addressing this issue.