Closed pwep closed 5 years ago
...and three structural errors for test-StSignificanceTestingCad.R
using:
Dataset | FOM | Method |
---|---|---|
datasetCadLroc | Wilcoxon | dualModality |
datasetCadLroc | PCL | dualModality |
datasetCadLroc | ALROC | dualModality |
✖ | 17 3 | Significance testing: StSignificanceTestingCadVsRadiologists [77.8 s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
test-StSignificanceTestingCad.R:36: failure: StSignificanceTestingCadVsRadiologists
StSignificanceTestingCadVsRadiologists(...) not equal to `ret`.
Component "ciAvgRdrEachTrt": Component "StdErr": Attributes: < target is NULL, current is list >
Component "ciAvgRdrEachTrt": Component "StdErr": target is numeric, current is array
Component "ciAvgRdrEachTrt": Component "DF": Attributes: < target is NULL, current is list >
Component "ciAvgRdrEachTrt": Component "DF": target is numeric, current is array
Dataset = datasetCadLroc, FOM = Wilcoxon, method = dualModality
test-StSignificanceTestingCad.R:36: failure: StSignificanceTestingCadVsRadiologists
StSignificanceTestingCadVsRadiologists(...) not equal to `ret`.
Component "ciAvgRdrEachTrt": Component "StdErr": Attributes: < target is NULL, current is list >
Component "ciAvgRdrEachTrt": Component "StdErr": target is numeric, current is array
Component "ciAvgRdrEachTrt": Component "DF": Attributes: < target is NULL, current is list >
Component "ciAvgRdrEachTrt": Component "DF": target is numeric, current is array
Dataset = datasetCadLroc, FOM = PCL, method = dualModality
test-StSignificanceTestingCad.R:36: failure: StSignificanceTestingCadVsRadiologists
StSignificanceTestingCadVsRadiologists(...) not equal to `ret`.
Component "ciAvgRdrEachTrt": Component "StdErr": Attributes: < target is NULL, current is list >
Component "ciAvgRdrEachTrt": Component "StdErr": target is numeric, current is array
Component "ciAvgRdrEachTrt": Component "DF": Attributes: < target is NULL, current is list >
Component "ciAvgRdrEachTrt": Component "DF": target is numeric, current is array
Dataset = datasetCadLroc, FOM = ALROC, method = dualModality
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Push request #21 is required to identify the Dataset, FOM, Method which raised the errors.
Please see latest commit; I could find no substantive errors in file StSignficanceTesting.R for the first failure; I cleaned up code some; I regenerated to goodValues folders and Travis passes on all 3 checks (including new version of R); details in commit message
More on the errors. Use str
to show the structure of the data frame.
I have rebuild an old dataset02WilcoxonDBMH
RDS file from R v3.6.0 and printed the structure using str
. The results are shown below, for the ciAvgRdrEachTrtRRRC
section, which is a source of one of the errors.
> oldData2WilcoxonDBMH <- readRDS("oldData2WilcoxonDBMH.rds")
> str(oldData2WilcoxonDBMH[9])
List of 1
$ ciAvgRdrEachTrtRRRC:'data.frame': 2 obs. of 6 variables:
..$ Treatment: Factor w/ 2 levels "0","1": 1 2
..$ Area : num [1:2] 0.897 0.941
..$ StdErr : num [1:2(1d)] 0.0332 0.0216
..$ DF : num [1:2(1d)] 12.7 12.7
..$ CILower : num [1:2] 0.825 0.894
..$ CIUpper : num [1:2] 0.969 0.988
Notice how StdErr
and DF
are listed as num [1:2(1d)]
In the v3.6.1 equivalent, the ciAvgRdrEachTrtRRRC
section now reads...
> newData2WilcoxonDBMH <- readRDS("tests/testthat/goodValues/SigTest/dataset02WilcoxonDBMH")
> str(newData2WilcoxonDBMH[9])
List of 1
$ ciAvgRdrEachTrtRRRC:'data.frame': 2 obs. of 6 variables:
..$ Treatment: Factor w/ 2 levels "0","1": 1 2
..$ Area : num [1:2] 0.897 0.941
..$ StdErr : num [1:2] 0.0332 0.0216
..$ DF : num [1:2] 12.7 12.7
..$ CILower : num [1:2] 0.825 0.894
..$ CIUpper : num [1:2] 0.969 0.988
StdErr
and DF
now have a structure shown as num [1:2]
This change is related to the bug fix in R v3.6.1.
Pull request #23 will make all versions generate the same structure (the v3.6.1 structure), so one set of goodValues RDS files are required.
Hi Peter,
Thanks as always for the careful explanations. I am on the laptop now, which has 3.6.0 installed, so I cannot generate the goodValues files. If you have access to 3.6.1, could you? Otherwise I will need to wait until the 18th, when I return home. [I would like to keep this machine on the old-release, for debugging purposes.]
The relevant code is in a self-explanatory file in testthat (cleanGenerateGoodValues.R), which needs to be uncommented and run once!
#
delete the directory goodValues
Thanks,
Dev
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 3:45 AM Peter Phillips notifications@github.com wrote:
More on the errors. Use str to show the structure of the data frame.
I have rebuild an old dataset02WilcoxonDBMH RDS file from R v3.6.0 and printed the structure using str. The results are shown below, for the ciAvgRdrEachTrtRRRC section, which is a source of one of the errors.
oldData2WilcoxonDBMH <- readRDS("oldData2WilcoxonDBMH.rds") str(oldData2WilcoxonDBMH[9]) List of 1 $ ciAvgRdrEachTrtRRRC:'data.frame': 2 obs. of 6 variables: ..$ Treatment: Factor w/ 2 levels "0","1": 1 2 ..$ Area : num [1:2] 0.897 0.941 ..$ StdErr : num [1:2(1d)] 0.0332 0.0216 ..$ DF : num [1:2(1d)] 12.7 12.7 ..$ CILower : num [1:2] 0.825 0.894 ..$ CIUpper : num [1:2] 0.969 0.988
Notice how StdErr and DF are listed as num [1:2(1d)]
In the v3.6.1 equivalent, the ciAvgRdrEachTrtRRRC section now reads...
newData2WilcoxonDBMH <- readRDS("tests/testthat/goodValues/SigTest/dataset02WilcoxonDBMH") str(newData2WilcoxonDBMH[9]) List of 1 $ ciAvgRdrEachTrtRRRC:'data.frame': 2 obs. of 6 variables: ..$ Treatment: Factor w/ 2 levels "0","1": 1 2 ..$ Area : num [1:2] 0.897 0.941 ..$ StdErr : num [1:2] 0.0332 0.0216 ..$ DF : num [1:2] 12.7 12.7 ..$ CILower : num [1:2] 0.825 0.894 ..$ CIUpper : num [1:2] 0.969 0.988
StdErr and DF now have a structure shown as num [1:2]
This change is related to the bug fix https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17570 in R v3.6.1.
Pull request #23 https://github.com/dpc10ster/RJafroc/pull/23 will make all versions generate the same structure (the v3.6.1 structure), so one set of goodValues RDS files are required.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dpc10ster/RJafroc/issues/22?email_source=notifications&email_token=AH4NJRCD722L6FYWZXIC76TP7GBZXA5CNFSM4H7RDE7KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODZ3MB3I#issuecomment-511099117, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH4NJRDL4B65V4WKXBOJHNLP7GBZXANCNFSM4H7RDE7A .
The R CMD check failures occur on both 3.6.0 and 3.6.1.
However, there are no failures on using devtools::check()
.
In any case the relevant testing code has a skip_on_cran()
statement.
I am not going to worry about this issue. I think the issue belongs with R CMD
check or RStudio.
Four structural errors in
test-significance-testing.R
for the following combinations: