Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Windows? Mac? They have native IM clients like Miranda and Adium X... I don't
think
they will like to switch.
Original comment by jakub.ru...@gmail.com
on 14 Jun 2008 at 9:32
sometimes I need to use windows for school work, so I'd rather use Galaxium
instead
of Windows Live Messenger/mIRC/pidgin
also, Galaxium is designed to support several GUI interfaces, so theoretically
you
could have a native GUI on all platforms (practically I don't think we should
expect
that the happen the first 1-2 years)
Original comment by ben.motm...@gmail.com
on 14 Jun 2008 at 10:09
What's the status of this? From what I can see libgalaxium has only .cab
extract and
gstreamer stuff... And I personally could live well without the gstreamer
support.
I'd like to use a modified (probably with a plugin) Galaxium in a personal
project,
but there Windows and Mac support is primary and sounds and advanced IM
functionality
is secondary. It might be that Galaxium doesn't really fit my needs, but it
looks
very nice and attractive, the users would certainly like it.
Can I get an estimation of what would it need to run it on Windows and Mac if
I'm
interested and can work on it? Here you can now assume to have GTK# available,
since
I'm not necessarily interested in native GUIs.
Original comment by juh...@gmail.com
on 5 Dec 2008 at 12:08
all the C# code should be portable, the plugins like gstreamer, webkit, gecko,
...
are easy to disable and are optional
the only things that needs some work, is libgalaxium (MSN needs the ability to
extract .cab files to load winks). I suspect it will take about 1-2 hours of
work to
make libgalaxium compile on Windows/Mac
Original comment by ben.motm...@gmail.com
on 5 Dec 2008 at 5:03
Thanks for the fast reply. Gstreamer is naturally available on other platforms
too,
but it's an annoying dependency so I'll probably just disable that. Ah, that
.cab
extracting is for winks...no wonder. I was a bit curious what it's used for,
but not
enough to look further. In the long run it would probably be better to rewrite
in C#
but this does for now.
Anyway this doesn't sound bad at all, I think I'll do some experiments on it
during
the following week or a bit later, since some other stuff also came up. I don't
want
to make empty promises, but I might try to help you guys here.
Original comment by juh...@gmail.com
on 6 Dec 2008 at 5:19
OMG. Windows user here (part time Ubuntu). This is the best chat client I've
ever
seen. If this ever gets built for Windows the same way that Pidgin is, I think
it
will replace Pidgin (which is already popular) on everyone's computers.
Native interface + Tango + Features = Sex
Keep up the good work, guys.
Original comment by sweatyf...@gmail.com
on 29 Apr 2009 at 2:12
the only bad thing about it is that it's in C# and needs mono
Original comment by jonathasrr
on 18 Sep 2009 at 7:11
That's a very good thing as C# is one of the best (if not the best) programming
language available.
Original comment by ekera...@gmail.com
on 6 Mar 2010 at 1:20
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ben.motm...@gmail.com
on 4 Apr 2008 at 8:33