Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Hello Bernhard,
I've used the two pictures you've provided in issue 9 (before and after
geocoding)
but I don't see any problem.
You can find below an exiftool report for both files (exiftool.exe file.cr2).
To check visually for the differences you could use PSPad editor (a freeware):
http://www.pspad.com/
Then use the "Tools"->"Text differences"
Concerning the thumbnails I've visually looked at them with IrfanView can't
really
see myself a difference (see file attached).
That said if it the case I probably can't make any change,I'm just using
EXIFTool so
it would be better to look there.
http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/
Thanks
francois
Original comment by francois...@gmail.com
on 22 Jul 2007 at 8:02
Attachments:
Hello Francois,
you were looking at the exif records. There everything is ok. My problem
concerns the
IPTC records. I investigated a bit more. After gpicsync run the By-Line is not
visible in IMATCH anymore. But I can see it in the adobe tools (Bridge). If I
develop
the CR2 using Adobe Camera Raw, the By-line returns in the JPG file. So the
problem
might be with IMATCH. I will do further investigations and open a new issue if
the
problem returns to gpicsync.
Concerning the thumbnails (preview image): this is very strange, If I compare
the
files in IrfanView, there is a difference (see the attachment). Nevertheless, I
already wrote to phil.
Considering these two effects, it might be a bit risky to geotag the origianl
CR2
files. But in the workflow it is rather elegant to tag the original files.
Bernhard
Original comment by bernhard...@googlemail.com
on 23 Jul 2007 at 6:59
Attachments:
Hello Bernhard,
""" you were looking at the exif records. """
Caption-Abstract and Keywords are IPTC tags and they are visible as you can see
on
the previous attached files.
Also if I do a "exiftool.exe -iptc:all " on your original file it returns
nothing.
francois
Original comment by francois...@gmail.com
on 23 Jul 2007 at 8:35
"""Concerning the thumbnails (preview image): this is very strange, If I
compare the
files in IrfanView, there is a difference (see the attachment)."""
I don't think it can help but for information on my previous sreenshoot I was
using
IrfanView 3.99 on WinXP SP2
""" Considering these two effects, it might be a bit risky to geotag the
origianl CR2
files."""
Always leave the backup option which is there by default. I also make a backup
straight from the memory card of my camera.
Thanks
francois
Original comment by francois...@gmail.com
on 23 Jul 2007 at 8:52
one more question? if the backup directory already contains such an image, will
this
be overridden?
I sometimes repeate the geotagging process after correcting either the GPX-File
or
even the geonames entry.
In this case the second run would override the backups from the previous run.
Original comment by bernhard...@googlemail.com
on 23 Jul 2007 at 10:16
""" one more question? if the backup directory already contains such an image,
will
this be overridden?"""
No it won't override the original backup (I first check if it exist and it is
the
case I keep it to avoid the problem you mention below). Even so I still advise
to
make some backup directly from the camera.
francois
Original comment by francois...@gmail.com
on 23 Jul 2007 at 8:20
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
bernhard...@googlemail.com
on 20 Jul 2007 at 1:57