Closed hiroshige-g closed 6 years ago
I'm not sure whether:
[A] we should fire all <script>
error events in (1) (i.e. fix error events for http://:broken
as a non-LAPI-related HTML spec issue), or
[B] fire all URL-parser-related <script>
error events in (2) (i.e. fix error events for std:none|http://:broken
inside LAPI spec).
Fixing issue #16 will be helpful for [B].
URL parse error inside layered API fetching URL, e.g.
std:none|http://:broken
, is handled a little differently from usual URL parse errors (e.g.http://:broken
).<script>
error events forstd:none|http://:broken
are (1) fired in #execute-a-script-block.<script>
error events for non-URL-parsing reasons are (1) fired in #execute-a-script-block.<script>
error events forhttp://:broken
are (2) fired asynchronously, immediately after #prepare-a-script.