When reviewing a larger mapping activity, it can be a bit tricky to distinguish missing mappings from scripts (constants e.t.c.) as they appear the same in the source column, and the script indicators are all the way to the right:
It would be more intuitive to have information regarding the source data in the source column, e.g., with some sort of visual indicator that this is a script source mapping and not just a source column mapping. That would also release some real estate in as the "Script type" and "Script value" could be removed:
Hi :)
When reviewing a larger mapping activity, it can be a bit tricky to distinguish missing mappings from scripts (constants e.t.c.) as they appear the same in the source column, and the script indicators are all the way to the right:
It would be more intuitive to have information regarding the source data in the source column, e.g., with some sort of visual indicator that this is a script source mapping and not just a source column mapping. That would also release some real estate in as the "Script type" and "Script value" could be removed:
Br. Lars