search

dzxs / django-photologue

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/django-photologue
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
0 stars 0 forks source link

Dutch locale #133

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I know there's some big changes going on (what with imagekit integration
and such), but I though I'd submit this anyway.

This diff (agains revision 405) contains a decent Dutch translation for
photologue, plus two gettext fixes in models.py. I'm not sure how to fill
in the first 16 lines of the generated .po, so those should probably be
checked for sanity.

Please let me know if anything else is needed. E.g.; should I translate
against the 3.x repository instead?

Also, my apologies if this isn't the right way to submit a patch; this is
my first time using SVN.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by peter-pa...@gtempaccount.com on 9 Sep 2009 at 1:11

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Can this at least get the status "NeedsVerification"? Right now I feel I've 
done a 
lot of work for absolutely nothing. The translation is just being ignored.

Also, how do you plan on verifying translations? Can I somehow 'prove' that my 
translation is 'worthy'? I do have a Certificate of Proficiency in English from 
the University of Cambridge, which is at level C2 of the CEFR (Common European 
Framework 
of Reference for Languages) - see: http://www.cambridgeesol.org/exams/general-
english/cpe.html

What I'm trying to say is; I'm basically a nice guy, so my translations aren't 
malicious. ;)

Original comment by peter-pa...@gtempaccount.com on 21 Nov 2009 at 9:31

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Hey there,

It seems no translation is getting through.. Could you explain how to do this 
manually?

Original comment by Martijn....@gmail.com on 24 Jan 2010 at 10:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Hey Martijn,

Please accept my apologies for the extremely late reply. I have a filter in 
place so 
any notifications skip my inbox. I've been very busy lately and didn't see your 
reply 
until now.

To answer your question: I think you should be able to apply the patch using 
SVN (or 
git, if you use it). As I said it was made against r405, but since r406 and 
r407 only 
affect the wiki, it's safe to apply it to the current SVN head (r407).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Original comment by peter-pa...@gtempaccount.com on 17 Feb 2010 at 8:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Translation added - thanks for the contribution.

Original comment by richardb...@gmail.com on 3 Sep 2012 at 9:39