issues
search
echdeploy
/
draft-ech-deployment-considerations
IETF draft describing TLS ECH deployment considerations
Other
4
stars
1
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Need better justification for why SNI is needed
#32
taddhar
closed
11 months ago
3
if there are deployment considerations missing, we ought to enumerate them in the next draft.
#31
taddhar
opened
1 year ago
2
Elaborate on endpoint security complications?
#30
taddhar
opened
1 year ago
2
Keep streamlining, clarifying the text e.g. the 2 approaches in the public network service providers section, "Technically the blocking ...".
#29
taddhar
closed
1 year ago
3
Find missing sources to illustrate a number of points, e.g. show how adversaries use digital transformation to accelerate their attacks, how ECH will increase security risks.
#28
taddhar
closed
1 year ago
1
Consolidation considerations - the use of ECH may accelerate the move of content away from standalone servers and on to CDNs, reducing infrastructure resilience.
#27
taddhar
opened
1 year ago
2
What prevents a Client Facing server providing security solutions to protect the data path?
#26
taddhar
opened
1 year ago
2
The Client Facing servers are acting as a new category of middleboxes
#25
taddhar
opened
1 year ago
3
What happens if Client Facing servers are controlled by malicious actors?
#24
taddhar
opened
1 year ago
0
Will there be any impact to the DNS by adding so many new RRs?
#23
taddhar
closed
1 year ago
1
Decision to transfer this github's ownership to Arnaud
#22
taddhar
closed
1 year ago
1
Decision to make this github public
#21
taddhar
closed
1 year ago
1
Reconcile Andrew's Campling list from the Side meeting with the current issues in GitHub
#20
taddhar
closed
1 year ago
2
Deliver -04 to support Gianpaolo
#19
taddhar
closed
1 year ago
0
If there are deployment considerations missing, we ought to enumerate them in the next draft.
#18
taddhar
closed
1 year ago
1
It would be a great contribution to enumerate all the types of middleboxes that are reliant on the SNI and ALPN.
#17
taddhar
closed
11 months ago
0
Check the statement "The solution is on Endpoint Security"
#16
taddhar
closed
1 year ago
2
Need to check "Visibility is the worst possible way to secure a network but it's our last line and there aren't choices."
#15
taddhar
opened
1 year ago
2
Is it just the SNI or as well the ALPN
#14
taddhar
closed
11 months ago
0
The SNI is unreliable and shouldn't have been used in the first place
#13
taddhar
closed
11 months ago
1
The I-D is pretty negative and should as well highlight the benefits of ECH
#12
taddhar
closed
1 year ago
3
Are the client facing server to backend server interactions clear enough?
#11
taddhar
opened
1 year ago
4
Decision on the way forward with this Internet Draft
#10
taddhar
closed
1 year ago
3
Fix Gianpaolo's contribution text (missed change).
#9
taddhar
closed
2 years ago
0
Final review with Andrew on all the inputs and comments editorial and…
#8
taddhar
closed
2 years ago
0
Andrew editorial changes and improvements.
#7
taddhar
closed
2 years ago
0
Fixing a number of editorial issues and bugs on my side
#6
taddhar
closed
2 years ago
0
Fixing a few editorial issues.
#5
taddhar
closed
2 years ago
1
Adding Daniel Engberg from SEB
#4
taddhar
closed
2 years ago
2
Fixed the Enterprise Section now in sync with Google Docs.
#3
taddhar
closed
2 years ago
0
Significant sync from Google Docs version to prepare its retirement.
#2
taddhar
closed
2 years ago
0
New contributor added
#1
taddhar
closed
2 years ago
0
Previous