Closed pzygielo closed 1 year ago
To not lost the Prepare next development cycle for ...
commits, should they be needed for some reason in the future.
Given many branches were kept for 2 or 3 years, they looked like very needed for something.
To not lost the
Prepare next development cycle for ...
commits, should they be needed for some reason in the future.
Aha, so the only purpose is to have this diff here on GitHub? Deleted branches won't be in any clone of the repo, just tags (which is usually enough). I am not sure if it is enough, but while it is just about these changes, ok ...
Aha, so the only purpose is to have
My intention is to have Restore branch button. In other words - to delete the branch, but have the way to restore it easily, without using other fork (which at the required time might be none). The tag points to the commit-before.
Hmm, on one hand I see it as an antipattern, on the other ... well, if we take it as a part of THE lifecycle, that at some point in time we drop unsupported branches, but we still keep some track of them somewhere ... Ok, that's a good idea :-)
If the branch is deleted, what is the purpose of these PRs? I see just these tags: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/glassfish-woodstock/tags