The Eclipse SDV Blueprints project is licensed under Apache 2.0 (https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/automotive.sdv-blueprints). Therefore, this software-orchestration repository uses Apache 2.0 as its license too and has an Apache 2.0 license file in the root directory.
However, as seen in #17 and #20 we received PRs licensed under MIT.
This leads me to the question whether we want to re-license the Software Orchestration blueprint under the MIT license.
To my understanding this would require the approval of the people that contributed so far.
What do you think @ladatz @odra @inf17101 ?
Expected outcome
Decision whether the Software Orchestration team can and want to license under the MIT license.
Tasks
[ ] get approval from people that contributed so far
odra
commented
1 month ago
Description
The Eclipse SDV Blueprints project is licensed under Apache 2.0 (https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/automotive.sdv-blueprints). Therefore, this software-orchestration repository uses Apache 2.0 as its license too and has an Apache 2.0 license file in the root directory.
However, as seen in #17 and #20 we received PRs licensed under MIT. This leads me to the question whether we want to re-license the Software Orchestration blueprint under the MIT license. To my understanding this would require the approval of the people that contributed so far. What do you think @ladatz @odra @inf17101 ?
Expected outcome
Decision whether the Software Orchestration team can and want to license under the MIT license.
Tasks